Banner

About Us

We must explain to you how all seds this mistakens idea off denouncing pleasures and praising pain was born and I will give you a completed accounts of the system and expound.

Contact Info

123/A, Miranda City Likaoli Prikano, Dope United States

+0989 7876 9865 9

info@example.com

Media Organisations Show Concern Regarding Attempts to Stifle Media in Sri Lanka

Members of the media have carried out many protests in past against harassment, threats and curtailing of freedom of the press

In a letter addressed to the Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, the Media Organisations Collective, comprising several leading media organisations in the country, has expressed concerns on attempts by MPs to use Parliamentary Powers and Privileges to stifle media freedom.

The letter:

Attempts to suppress media activity using Parliamentary Powers and Privileges law against journalists

When Parliament met on February 8, Member of Parliament D. Weerasinghe cited an article in the Sunday Lankadeepa news paper dated January 28,2024, headlined ‘Supreme Court amendments not in online safety Act; Opposition demands meeting of party leaders before Speaker signs it’ as having breached his privileges as a member who voted for the Bill and requested the Speaker to direct the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges to take appropriate action. In response, you had stated the request would be presented to the Committee as a question of privilege.

We, as leading media organisations in Sri Lanka who are signatories to this letter, wish to inform you that while alert to the government’s contemptible efforts to use Parliamentary powers and privileges to stifle media freedom, unequivocally condemn all attempts to suppress people’s rights to know the truth by intimidating journalists.

The article published by Lankadeepa was not a news report based on false information. On the contrary,, it was an attempt to inform the general public about the serious and demonstrated shortcomings that were observed in the process of having the Online Safety Bill adopted. This is a view shared by a majority of the general public.

Communicating the right information to the public is a social responsibility of the media. And in that context, the news article in question was fulfilling that responsibility. The media, civil society activists, trade union activists and opposition have from the outset urged you, as Speaker of the House, not to present the Bill in Parliament due to its numerous flaws. It is also a well-known fact that you have ignored repeated calls by the opposition for a meeting of party leaders to discuss the Bill, both before it was brought up to for debate. Several leading organisations, including the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, have also issued statements to the media detailing the flaws of the bill and its process. We, as leading media organisations, question how reporting on demands made by the opposition regarding the Online Safety Act or any other Act, can be deemed a breach of parliamentary privileges of MPs. Our conviction is that the media has tried to report on the fundamental rights violation of the people in the hopes of rectifying it, not questioning the parliamentary powers and privileges of its members. This is the role of the media. This is fulfilling its social responsibility.

Your decision to refer the matter related to the news report to the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges is an unwelcome surprise. However, we take this opportunity to inform you that we are keenly watching the government’s efforts to suppress the media using an obsolete law with no specific provisions for ‘ trial and punishment’. Your action is an obstruction to the right of journalists to report freely and also impinges on the right of the public to true and accurate information.

Therefore, we earnestly request you, as the Hon. Speaker not to contribute to the government’s efforts to suppress the media using the powers and privileges of Parliament. We wish to  remind you that we have strongly opposed and expressed our condemnation if instances where journalists were summoned or attempted were made to summon them before the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges in the Past and that our stance hasn’t changed. We remain strongly opposed to and condemn any attempts to summon journalists before the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges for fulfilling their journalistic and social responsibility obligations.

Thank you!

Media Organisation Collective

( The letter was signed and supported by Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association, Free Media Movement, Sri Lanka Muslim Media Forum, Tamil Media Alliance, Sri Lanka Young Journalists’ Association,  South Asian Free Media Association (Sri Lanka Chapter)

Leave a Reply